Starbucks (C16) - Conc C

6000 N Terminal Pkwy Conc C, Atlanta, GA 30320
Café / Breakfast
License: Food Service
Last inspected: Feb 18, 2025
70
Score
Medium Risk

Across the available record, Starbucks (C16) - Conc C has three inspections on file, the first dated 2024. Inspectors last stopped by on Feb 18, 2025. The medium risk tier sits in the middle: not spotless, but not alarming either.

There hasn't been much movement either way: counts have stayed near three violations per visit across recent inspections.

The pattern that stands out is “proper cold holding temperatures”, which has been cited three times.

Starbucks (C16) - Conc C's latest score of 70 falls below the Atlanta average of 90. The record is unremarkable in either direction.

3
Inspections
1
Critical latest
2
Major latest
0
Minor latest
Inspection History
Feb 18, 2025
Routine
1 critical violation. 2 major violations. 1 corrected on site.
View 3 violations
6-1A - proper cold holding temperatures
Inspector notes: Observed TCs foods not cold holding at 41F or below. Advised to relocate
511-6-1.04(6)(f)
2-2D - adequate handwashing facilities supplied & accessible (corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed hand sink completely blocked by large box. COS- box was removed
511-6-1.06(2)(o)
16A - hot and cold water available; adequate pressure
Inspector notes: Observed hand sinks with no hot water available. Advised to repair
511-6-1.06(1)(g)
70
Mar 7, 2024
Followup
1 critical violation. 1 major violation. 1 corrected on site.
View 2 violations
6-1A - proper cold holding temperatures
Inspector notes: Observed several TCS foods not cold holding at 41F or below. Advised to decrease ambient of coolers during busy periods.
511-6-1.04(6)(f)
2-2D - adequate handwashing facilities supplied & accessible (corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed back hand sink completely blocked by boxes. COS- boxes were moved.
511-6-1.06(2)(o)
78
Feb 5, 2024
Routine
1 critical violation. 2 major violations. 2 minor violations. 1 corrected on site.
View 5 violations
6-1A - proper cold holding temperatures (corrected on site)
Inspector notes: Observed several TCS foods not cold holding at 41F or below. COS- PIC discarded food items. Discussed possibly using time as a public health control
511-6-1.04(6)(f)
2-2D - adequate handwashing facilities supplied & accessible
Inspector notes: Observed handsink with coffee grounds stored inside. Advised handsink is only for washing hands and no other purposes
511-6-1.06(2)(o)
16A - hot and cold water available; adequate pressure
Inspector notes: Observed both handsinks with no hot water. COS- store was temporarily closed until hot water was restored. Water was restored to 100F during inspection Facility ok to reopen
511-6-1.06(1)(g)
16B - plumbing installed; proper backflow devices
Inspector notes: Observed leaks at pipe of hand sink and dish sink. Advised to have repaired
511-6-1.06(2)(r)
18 - insects, rodents, and animals not present
Inspector notes: Observed fly activity in facility. Advised to clean and notify pest control.
511-6-1.07(5)(k)
64

Frequently Asked Questions

When was Starbucks (C16) - Conc C last inspected?

The most recent health inspection at Starbucks (C16) - Conc C on file is from Feb 18, 2025. The public record contains three inspections in total.

What is the most common violation at Starbucks (C16) - Conc C?

Across the inspection record, “proper cold holding temperatures” has been cited three times, more than any other issue at Starbucks (C16) - Conc C.

How does Starbucks (C16) - Conc C compare to other restaurants in Atlanta?

Starbucks (C16) - Conc C most recently scored 70 out of 100, which is lower than the Atlanta average of 90.

Has Starbucks (C16) - Conc C's inspection record improved over time?

Results have been roughly steady. Inspections at Starbucks (C16) - Conc C have averaged around three violations per visit across the recent record.

What does a medium risk rating mean?

A medium risk rating at Starbucks (C16) - Conc C means the most recent inspection turned up a handful of issues that the health department wrote up but did not classify as critical.